Statistical primer: methodology and reporting of meta-analyses†
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Methodology and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
BACKGROUND Relatively little is known of the use of systematic review and synthesis methods of non-randomised psychiatric epidemiological studies, which play a vital role in aetiological research, planning and policy-making. AIMS To evaluate reviews of psychiatric epidemiological studies of functional mental disorders that employed synthesis methods such as systematic review or meta-analysis,...
متن کاملGuidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research
Published research should be reported to evidence users with clarity and transparency that facilitate optimal appraisal and use of evidence and allow replication by other researchers. Guidelines for such reporting are available for several types of studies but not for meta-epidemiological methodology studies. Meta-epidemiological studies adopt a systematic review or meta-analysis approach to ex...
متن کاملEditorial: CORR® criteria for reporting meta-analyses.
Meta-analyses and systematic reviews provide ways of synthesizing literature to clarify issues on which there is controversy or to confirm generally held views. They are used increasingly in orthopaedic surgery and other fields: a PubMed search of orthopaedic meta-analyses using ‘‘(orthopaedic[ad] OR orthopedic[ad]) AND meta-analysis[ti]’’ yielded 145 articles, 104 of which were published since...
متن کاملA Primer on Performing Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
The number of systematic reviews published in the peer-reviewed literature has increased dramatically in the last decade, and for good reason. They have become an essential resource for clinicians who want unbiased and current answers for their clinical questions; researchers and funders who want to identify the most critical evidence gaps for study; payers and administrators who want to make c...
متن کاملReporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses in urological literature
PURPOSE To assess the overall quality of published urological meta-analyses and identify predictive factors for high quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched PubMed to identify meta-analyses published from January 1st, 2011 to December 31st, 2015 in 10 predetermined major paper-based urology journals. The characteristics of the included meta-analyses were collected, and their...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
سال: 2018
ISSN: 1010-7940,1873-734X
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy004